The Difference Between Audit Risk and Control Risk

Audit risk and control risk are two fundamental concepts in the field of auditing. They are used to assess and manage the risks associated with conducting an audit engagement. While both risks are related to the audit process, they have distinct meanings and implications.




Table: Difference between Audit Risk and Control Risk

CriteriaAudit RiskControl Risk
DefinitionThe risk that an auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated.The risk that a misstatement in an assertion or the underlying transaction level will not be prevented, detected, or corrected by the entity’s internal controls.
NatureInherent to the audit process and arises due to the possibility of errors, fraud, or other misstatements in the financial statements.Specific to the effectiveness and reliability of an organization’s internal control system in preventing or detecting material misstatements.
EvaluationAssessed by considering the combination of inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk.Assessed by evaluating the design and implementation of internal controls within the organization.
Impact on AuditHigh audit risk increases the likelihood of the auditor issuing an incorrect or inappropriate audit opinion, compromising the credibility of the audit engagement.High control risk indicates a higher likelihood of material misstatements not being prevented or detected by the entity’s internal controls, which may require the auditor to perform more substantive procedures.
ManagementManaged and controlled by the auditor through appropriate planning, assessment of risk, and the application of audit procedures.Managed and controlled by the entity’s management through the design, implementation, and monitoring of effective internal controls.
FocusFocuses on the overall risk of the audit engagement and the auditor’s responsibility to express an appropriate opinion on the financial statements.Focuses on the effectiveness of internal controls in mitigating the risk of material misstatements in the financial statements.
MitigationMitigated through the application of audit procedures, including substantive testing and tests of controls, to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.Mitigated through the design and implementation of effective internal controls, monitoring their operation, and remediation of control deficiencies.
RelationshipAudit risk is a combination of inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk, where control risk is one component.Control risk is a specific component of audit risk that relates to the effectiveness of internal controls in preventing or detecting material misstatements.

Conclusion: Audit risk and control risk are essential concepts in auditing that address different aspects of the audit process. Audit risk pertains to the overall risk associated with the possibility of issuing an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated.




It considers inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. Control risk, on the other hand, focuses specifically on the risk associated with the effectiveness of an organization’s internal controls in preventing or detecting material misstatements. Control risk impacts the auditor’s assessment of the entity’s internal controls and may influence the nature and extent of substantive procedures performed. Both audit risk and control risk are managed and mitigated through appropriate planning, risk assessment, and the application of audit procedures and internal controls, respectively.

RELATED POSTS