What are some examples of when you should use the internal rate of return (IRR) instead of net present value (NPV)?

The decision to use the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) or Net Present Value (NPV) in investment analysis depends on the specific characteristics of the investment and the preferences of the analyst or decision-maker. Here are some examples of situations where using IRR may be more appropriate than NPV:

  1. Evaluating Projects with Different Investment Sizes: When comparing multiple investment projects with significantly different initial investment amounts, the IRR can provide a more meaningful comparison. This is because IRR represents the percentage return on the initial investment, allowing for a direct comparison of the projects’ relative profitability.
  2. Assessing Projects with Shorter Investment Horizons: For projects with relatively short investment horizons, where cash flows are expected to be received quickly, IRR may be more relevant. IRR focuses on the time it takes to recoup the initial investment, making it useful for projects with rapid cash flow generation.
  3. Projects with High Reinvestment Rates: If a project is expected to generate significant cash inflows that can be reinvested at a rate close to or equal to the IRR, then the IRR becomes more relevant. IRR assumes that interim cash flows can be reinvested at the IRR itself, which may be reasonable in certain cases.
  4. Comparing Projects with Multiple Cash Flow Sign Changes: In situations where a project has multiple sign changes in cash flows (positive to negative or vice versa), the IRR can be useful in identifying the rate at which the NPV becomes zero. This is particularly relevant when analyzing projects with complex cash flow patterns.
  5. Evaluating Projects with High Revenues Early On: If a project is expected to generate significant revenues or benefits in the early years, followed by lower revenues later, the IRR can provide insight into the rate of return during the early profitable years.
  6. Emphasizing Relative Profitability: In scenarios where the primary goal is to identify the most profitable project among a set of alternatives, the IRR can be a more straightforward criterion. It helps rank projects based on their relative profitability.

While IRR has its strengths in certain situations, it is essential to recognize its limitations as well. For instance, IRR may not be suitable for projects with irregular cash flows, multiple IRRs, or when comparing mutually exclusive projects with different sizes and investment horizons.

In practice, financial analysts often use both IRR and NPV together to gain a comprehensive view of an investment opportunity. By considering both metrics, decision-makers can make better-informed choices and understand the trade-offs between short-term profitability (IRR) and absolute value (NPV) over the investment’s life.


Published by


IAM experienced geography teacher with more than three years of teaching and creating content related to geography and other subjects for both high school and college students. hope you will find the content of this website useful to your studies and daily life