The Difference Between LiDAR and Photogrammetry in Remote Sensing Applications

The Difference Between LiDAR and Photogrammetry in Remote Sensing Applications

LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and photogrammetry are two commonly used techniques in remote sensing applications. Both methods involve capturing data from the Earth’s surface, but they differ in the type of technology used, data acquisition process, and data analysis approaches. The following table presents a comparison between LiDAR and photogrammetry in remote sensing applications:

TechnologyUtilizes laser pulses to measure the time it takes for the light to travel to the target and back, enabling accurate 3D measurementsRelies on photographs or images taken from different viewpoints to extract 3D information through image processing
Data AcquisitionEmits laser pulses and measures the time-of-flight and intensity of the backscattered signal, capturing the range and intensity of points on the Earth’s surfaceCollects images or photographs using airborne or satellite sensors, capturing the appearance and texture of the Earth’s surface from different perspectives
Point Cloud GenerationCreates a dense point cloud by measuring the distance to objects or surfaces at each laser pulse reflection pointGenerates a point cloud by matching corresponding features in multiple overlapping images and estimating their 3D coordinates
AccuracyProvides high accuracy in terms of 3D positioning and measurements, allowing for precise mapping and analysisAccuracy depends on the image resolution, image quality, and ground control points used for georeferencing
Data DensityOffers high data density with numerous point measurements per square meter, providing detailed information about the Earth’s surfaceData density depends on the image resolution and flying height, resulting in a lower point density compared to LiDAR
Surface PenetrationCan penetrate vegetation and foliage to some extent, capturing information about the ground surface beneathRelies on the visibility of features and surfaces captured in the images, making it challenging to capture information obscured by vegetation or other objects
Data ApplicationsWidely used in applications such as topographic mapping, urban planning, forestry, flood modeling, infrastructure assessment, and terrain analysisApplied in various fields including photogrammetric mapping, 3D modeling, orthophoto generation, feature extraction, land cover classification, and change detection
Data LimitationsSensitive to atmospheric conditions, such as fog or heavy rain, which can attenuate the laser signal and affect data qualityAffected by image quality, shadows, occlusions, and geometric distortions that can impact the accuracy and quality of the derived 3D information
Data AnalysisInvolves processing and analyzing the acquired point cloud data using algorithms for filtering, classification, and feature extractionInvolves image processing techniques such as feature matching, bundle adjustment, stereo vision, and digital surface modeling
Equipment and CostRequires specialized LiDAR sensors, which can be expensive, and often requires dedicated flight operationsRelies on standard airborne or satellite imaging sensors, making it relatively more accessible and cost-effective
Vegetation AnalysisEnables the extraction of detailed vegetation structure information, such as canopy height, biomass estimation, or tree segmentationProvides visual information about vegetation cover and health but may face challenges in capturing detailed structural information

Conclusion: LiDAR and photogrammetry are two valuable techniques in remote sensing applications. LiDAR excels in providing high-accuracy 3D measurements and detailed information about the Earth’s surface, making it suitable for applications requiring precise mapping and analysis. Photogrammetry, on the other hand, relies on images captured from different perspectives to extract 3D information and is more accessible and cost-effective. The choice between LiDAR and photogrammetry depends on the specific requirements of the application, including accuracy

Published by


IAM experienced geography teacher with more than three years of teaching and creating content related to geography and other subjects for both high school and college students. hope you will find the content of this website useful to your studies and daily life

%d bloggers like this: