What is the difference between audit documentation and audit evidence?

What is the difference between audit documentation and audit evidence?

Audit documentation and audit evidence are two important concepts in the field of auditing. While they are related, they have distinct meanings and serve different purposes. Here’s a breakdown of the difference between audit documentation and audit evidence:

Audit Documentation: Audit documentation refers to the written record of the procedures, findings, and conclusions of an audit engagement. It includes the working papers, memos, schedules, and other forms of documentation that auditors prepare and retain as evidence of their work. Audit documentation provides a comprehensive trail of the auditor’s activities, judgments, and the basis for their opinions or conclusions.

Key Points about Audit Documentation:

  1. Internal Reference: Audit documentation is primarily used for internal reference within the audit firm. It helps auditors organize their work, document their procedures, and support the quality and adequacy of the audit work performed.
  2. Retention and Reference: Audit documentation is typically retained for a specified period, as mandated by auditing standards and legal requirements. It allows for future reference, review by supervisors, internal and external inspections, and to provide evidence of compliance with professional standards.
  3. Content and Format: Audit documentation should be organized, well-documented, and sufficiently detailed to support the work performed. It should include the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures, findings, exceptions, and conclusions reached by the auditor.
  4. Confidentiality and Access: Audit documentation is considered confidential and generally accessible only to authorized individuals, such as audit firm personnel, external inspectors, and regulators.

Audit Evidence: Audit evidence refers to the information and supporting documentation gathered by auditors during the course of an audit. It provides the basis for forming the auditor’s opinion or conclusion on the financial statements or specific assertions. Audit evidence is obtained through various procedures, such as inspection, observation, inquiry, and confirmation.

Key Points about Audit Evidence:

  1. External Corroboration: Audit evidence serves as external corroboration for the assertions made in the financial statements. It helps auditors evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and validity of the information presented.
  2. Relevance and Sufficiency: Audit evidence should be relevant and sufficient to support the auditor’s conclusions. It should be reliable, objective, and obtained from independent sources whenever possible.
  3. Documentation: Audit evidence is used to support the auditor’s findings and conclusions documented in the audit documentation. It is important to document the source, nature, and significance of the audit evidence obtained during the engagement.
  4. Audit Procedures: Auditors use various procedures to obtain audit evidence, such as inspection of documents, physical examination, observation, inquiry, and analytical procedures. These procedures are designed to gather relevant and reliable evidence to support the audit opinion.

In summary, audit documentation refers to the written record of the audit procedures, findings, and conclusions, while audit evidence is the information and supporting documentation gathered during the audit that forms the basis for the auditor’s conclusions. Audit documentation serves as internal reference, while audit evidence provides external corroboration and supports the auditor’s opinion or conclusions.


Published by


IAM experienced geography teacher with more than three years of teaching and creating content related to geography and other subjects for both high school and college students. hope you will find the content of this website useful to your studies and daily life