Give three differences between interview and observation

Interviews and observations are two common methods used in research to gather data. Here are three differences between interviews and observations:

1. Data Collection Approach:

• Interviews: Interviews involve direct interaction between the researcher and the participant(s). The researcher asks questions and receives responses from the participant(s). It is a verbal and interactive process where information is gathered through conversation and structured questioning.
• Observations: Observations involve the researcher observing and recording behaviors, actions, and events without direct interaction with the participants. It is a non-verbal and passive process where data is collected by carefully observing and documenting what is happening in a natural or controlled setting.

2. Nature of Data:

• Interviews: Interviews primarily collect qualitative data. The responses obtained during interviews provide insights into participants’ opinions, experiences, beliefs, and perspectives. Interviews allow for in-depth exploration of a topic and the opportunity to clarify responses or probe further.
• Observations: Observations can collect both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data is obtained by describing and interpreting observed behaviors, interactions, and patterns. Quantitative data can be collected by systematically recording specific behaviors or events, such as frequency, duration, or numerical counts.

3. Researcher Influence:

• Interviews: In interviews, the researcher has a direct influence on the data collected. The structure of the interview questions, the sequencing of questions, and the researcher’s probing or follow-up prompts can shape the responses and the depth of information obtained. The researcher’s presence and the rapport established with the participants can also influence the participants’ comfort level and willingness to share information.
• Observations: Observations aim to minimize the researcher’s influence on the observed behaviors or events. The researcher strives to remain as unobtrusive as possible, avoiding interference or alteration of the natural setting or participants’ behaviors. The focus is on capturing authentic and unbiased data without direct manipulation by the researcher.

While interviews and observations have distinct characteristics, they can also complement each other in research. Combining both methods can provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of a phenomenon, allowing for triangulation of data and validation of findings. The choice between interviews and observations depends on the research objectives, the nature of the research questions, and the specific context of the study.

RELATED POSTS

• ADVANTAGES OF INTERVIEW AS DATA COLLECTION TOOL IN RESEARCH
• TYPES OF INTERVIEWS IN RESEARCH DATA COLLECTION
• FACTORS THAT NEED TO BE DETERMINED IN ADVANCE OF ACTUAL INTERVIEW